I can't find any clear solution to this. I have a thread started with QtConcurrent::run()
. When I close the application before the thread is finished, the application crashes. I want the application to close after all backgroud threads (QtConcurrent::run()
) have finished. How do I solve this?
Asked
Active
Viewed 4,606 times
3

demonplus
- 5,613
- 12
- 49
- 68

Kevin yudo
- 233
- 4
- 15
-
`QFuture
future = QtConcurrent::run(yourFunction);` then you need to wait it to be finished : `future.waitForFinished();` – IAmInPLS May 18 '16 at 11:54 -
Thaks Alexis.İf I use future.waitForFinished() , GUi is locked . This must be background thread.When I close to Apps , QtConcurrent::run() must be finished – Kevin yudo May 18 '16 at 13:10
-
Then, look at this question : http://stackoverflow.com/q/12527141/5653461 and its answer of course – IAmInPLS May 18 '16 at 13:17
-
Use `QFutureWatcher::finished` signal. – thuga May 18 '16 at 13:49
-
how many threads are you starting? are you using `QtConcurrent::run()` from many classes? maybe you can use `future.waitForFinished()` in the destructors of the classes that are starting your threads. – Mike May 18 '16 at 16:58
2 Answers
4
I came here looking for the same thing as you and ended up solving it in my own way. This is my approach:
// [...] All necessary includes would go here
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
// Keep track of time
quint64 start=QDateTime::currentMSecsSinceEpoch();
// Qt app instance
QCoreApplication app(argc, argv);
// Someplace safe to keep our futures
QList<QFuture<void> > futures;
//Prepare the lambda that does the heavy lifting
auto lambda = [&] (void) {
// [...] Heavy lifting goes here
};
// Run up some processing
for(/* any number of heavy liftings we need */){
// Keep the returned future
auto future = QtConcurrent::run(lambda, /* parameters would go here*/ );
// Store the future around for later
futures.append(future);
};
//Now all the heavy lifting has started, and we are ready to wait for them all to complete.
for(auto future:futures){
// Note that if the future finished BEFORE we call this, it will still work.
future.waitForFinished();
}
// Spit out the number of seconds we were running
quint64 end=QDateTime::currentMSecsSinceEpoch();
qDebug()<<"DONE after" <<(((qreal)end-start)/1000.0)<<" sec";
//NOTICE: I did not need an event loop so no app.exec() call here
}
UPDATE 2018
I have since I wrote this answer gotten wiser, and decided to share another way to do that in some cases will be more elegant and save you some typing/boilerplate. It is called map-reduce and the nice bit is you don't need all of it, just the map part will work fine.
NOTE: It is a quick adaption of this example in the official documentation. See this example if you want to retain some output data as well.
// [...] All necessary includes would go here
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QGuiApplication app(argc, argv);
// Create a list containing data to be processed
QList<MyClass> tasks;
// At this point fill the list of tasks with whatever you need
// This is the actual code that will run per task
std::function<void(const MyClass&)> myOperation = [](const MyClass &task)
{
qDebug() << "Doing myOperation() in thread" << QThread::currentThread();
// Do heavy lifting on task object here
};
// Start the processing. QConcurrent will automagically start up threads, distribute the tasks and run them taking care of all the tedious threads management for you.
// It can also take care of collecting the output (not shown in this example).
// Finally , and most importantly the answer to the question; using the blockingMap will actually block execution until all the work is done.
QtConcurrent::blockingMap(tasks, myOperation);
return 0;
}

Mr. Developerdude
- 9,118
- 10
- 57
- 95
0
connect(qApp, &QCoreApplication::aboutToQuit, qApp, []() { QThreadPool::globalInstance()->waitForDone(); });

Moez Gadri
- 11
- 1